Wednesday, July 6, 2022

Bungie sues Destiny YouTuber for creating chaos with fake copyright strike

Bungie has sued destiny Players who allegedly submitted dozens of fake copyright strikes in its name.The lawsuit is Gaming PostCalifornia YouTube creator Nick Minor said he turned a single DMCA takedown notice into 96 fraudulent claims against other YouTube users.

The complaint alleges that Bungie “brand protection” contractor CSC Global sent Minor a legal copyright notice in December 2021 asking him to download destiny expansion captured kingMinor allegedly responded by creating a Gmail account mimicking CSC and then submitting similar requests to other YouTube accounts — even accessing the official Bungie account. He identified himself as a CSC representative and asked the accounts to remove the videos or face a YouTube copyright strike.

Meanwhile, under his YouTube alias Lord Nazo, Minor apparently launched what Bungie called a “disinformation” campaign against the studio. It claims he spread reports of rampant copyright strikes, falsely accused Bungie of overly aggressive enforcement, and distributed a “manifesto” “designed to sow confusion” over the legality of all Bungie DMCA requests . (In one editorial, it said the manifesto “reads like a serial killer’s trite ‘look what you asked me to do’ letter from a bad novel.”) It cites destiny Community members described the deletions as “heartbreaking” and “terrifying” and said the notices — which, if repeated, could lead to account deletion — made them afraid to post more videos.

“96 times, Minor allegedly sent DMCA takedown notices on behalf of Bungie, identifying itself as Bungie’s ‘brand protection’ vendor in order to get YouTube to instruct innocent creators to take down their Destiny 2 video,” the complaint states. “This destiny The community was baffled and upset that Bungie was breaking its promise to allow players to build their own streaming communities and YouTube channels on it. Destiny 2 content. Destiny publicly denied in March who was behind the incident and issued guidelines aimed at clarifying when to call for a takedown, saying it wanted to “bring more clarity to our boundaries as a business”.

The controversy drew reports in the gaming press, and Bungie said in March that it was investigating the issue. It identified Minor by connecting the dots between the different email addresses he used during the sprawling campaign, according to the complaint. It claims that Minor ran the operation in retaliation for the original takedown request, is seeking financial damages for defamation, filing false DMCA notices, and — somewhat ironically — copyright infringement.

In addition to Minor’s personal actions, Bungie suggested he exploited weaknesses in YouTube’s reporting system. For example, it said he was able to easily impersonate a CSC employee because YouTube requires all reports to come from a Gmail account, not a company domain that the content creator can verify. Bungie complained that Google’s system “completely allows anyone to claim removal on behalf of a rights holder, but has no real safeguards against fraud”.

More broadly, however, Minor’s campaign has worked because copyright law is a powerful, controversial weapon that can crack down on YouTube users (and other internet content) with little warning and painful consequences. creator). Other “copystrike” senders use the system to extort money or censor news, and studios like Nintendo have placed onerous copyright restrictions on their games in the past. Minor apparently just went a step further — weaponizing the backlash against the DMCA itself.


Related Articles

Latest Articles