Xóchitl Galvezo for Ruiz, Senator National Action Party ,wok), observed that the National Institute for Transparency, Access to Information and the Protection of Personal Data (INAI) prepare a constitutional dispute before the justice of the Supreme Court of the nation (scjn) against the decree of the President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (AMLO).
The MLA shared a video through his Twitter account, in which Congratulations INAI For his decision to present a constitutional dispute against the “decree”.
In the audiovisual, Paine assures that the federal president does not like these types of institutions because He likes to “walk in the dark”, because the institution, he declared, represents transparency, accountability and “in short, a light for citizens”.
“President dislikes autonomous bodies because he likes to walk in the dark, under water”
Along with the publication, the member of National Action wrote: “@INAImexico is the light that is needed so that the government does not use public money in the dark. As long as his #DecretazoPresidencial lasts, the president insists on calling it off, Let’s not allow this! ,
Before his tweet, reactions from internet users did not wait, as many attacked the MLA for aligning him in a party that “slanderous” considers superior to the current administration.
“I accept that a body is required to hold elections, but!with honest public servants!, clearly not aligned with the government‘s opposition which they use cynically!!! This is the last line of defense of legitimacy in this country with a corrupt government and its equally corrupt army. as a defender of transparency” and “when they publish things He convinced himself and voted with Morena, Why is there no emparo or legal action against the appointment of a person who does not meet the requirements of Banksico?” There were a few answers.
And that is, on November 23, the National Institute of Transparency announced that prepare a constitutional dispute Against the decree published by President López Obrador by which he classifies works and megaprojects as national security.
According to a statement, INAI indicated that, after analyzing the scope of the agreement, the Institute determined to exercise this constitutional control, “with which it seeks to restrain the agencies and institutions of the Federal Public Administration”. Will do Information relating to projects and tasks, in a generalized and predictable manner, reserved for national security Which the government fulfills.”
This, because the organ warned “a Possible violation of Article 6 of the Constitution, while national security is an information reserve budget, in accordance with Article 113 of the Common Law of Transparency and Access to Public Information”.
He also said that the decree published last Monday in the Official Gazette of the Federation (DoF), may infringe the right to access information, Since there is a risk that subjects obliged to generate information on these projects may pretend to reserve information on a contractual basis.
,INAI has a period of 30 business days beginning today to present the constitutional dispute before the SCJN. In the coming days, the plenary will approve the relevant agreement in public session along with the contentious points and legal arguments,” reads the document.