Fei Zhan Wenting, the former lead singer of the FIR band, and Chen Jianying, a member of the band, fell out with their teachers and trainees. The two sides had a contract dispute. Reputation crime. The Criminal Bureau’s identification signature was actually signed by Zhan Wenting. The Taipei District Prosecutor’s Office did not prosecute and punish him a year ago. Zhan Wenting was sued for false accusation.

Regarding the result, Chen Jianying replied: “Thanks to the justice for giving us justice. The court certified the personal visa to prove that we joined Huen Records with the former lead singer. No one from the band It wasn’t meant to be signed or kicked out privately. Over the years, we’ve done a lot of unnecessary things. Accusations and misunderstandings, I hope this brings out the truth, and I wish each of you the very best in music in the future. Looking forward to working hard, everyone has a piece of the sky, thank you for your concern!”

Now (13) evening, Zhan Wenting’s appointed lawyer also issued a statement, saying, “In view of today’s (June 13, 2023) media reports that Zhan Wenting accused Chen Jianying and others of forging documents and suing sued for non-prosecution, and Zhan Wenting has been accused of false accusations etc. This lawyer issues the following statement on behalf of our client Zhan Wenting, in order to avoid any misconception or misunderstanding by the outside world or the public , the sections are as follows:

1. As of the release of this statement, the lawyer and Zhan Wenting have not received the letter of sentencing from the Taipei District Prosecutor’s Office for the above case, and cannot respond to the contents of the case.

2. Our party Zhan Wenting filed a criminal complaint against Chen Jianying and others for forging documents because Zhan Wenting did not sign the letter of guarantee involved in the case, so he went to the judicial system to protect the violated rights channels sought and interests. During the investigation, Zhan Wenting also presented objective factual evidence to prove that the three-character signature “Zhan Wenting” on the letter of guarantee involved in the case was forged, and that Zhan Wenting did not make false accusations against others. Therefore, the results of the case “Zhan Wenting asked not to be prosecuted for forgery document”, “Zhan Wenting falsely accused Chen Jianying” and so on, are clearly different from the actual situation. This Advocate will assist client Jhan in going through these judicial relief proceedings.

3. The process of protecting rights and interests is difficult. Zhan Wenting filed a criminal complaint on July 26, 2019. During a period of about 4 years, the prosecutor once punished both parties for not prosecuting (forged documents, false accusations). Zhan, being dissatisfied with the results of the investigation, filed a petition for review, which was found fit for review and sent back for further investigation. After reviewing the material, the truth of the matter could not be ascertained during the ongoing investigation process, and was cleared without approval. prosecution.

4. In order to protect the rights and interests of our client Zhan Wenting, this lawyer will assist Zhan Wenting to renegotiate in accordance with the law after receiving the Non-Prosecution Sanction Letter, to clarify the facts and establish the truth. traceable; and actively present evidence in the trial process for the part of the false allegation, so as to restore innocence to the parties.

5. Since the matters covered in the above opening are still in judicial process, it is inconvenient to elaborate the controversies and doubts relating to this matter, in order to avoid affecting the subsequent investigation and review processes or trial procedures. Our party, Zhan Weiting, I want to attract the attention of the outside world and the media. Furthermore, we will continue to maintain facts and truth to protect our own rights and interests. Therefore, before the finalization of the court trial and verdict, we hope that the outside world and the media will strictly observe the limits of speech, and refrain from the unfair practice of judging without trial. If the facts are not known, Zhan Weiting’s reputation has been damaged due to the release of false information or malicious comments without permission, and should be investigated in accordance with the law.