U.S. states struggle to maintain controversial border policy Immigration News

Twenty-one U.S. states have argued that the Biden administration’s plan to end the disputed border ban, which prevents many refugees from seeking protection on the US-Mexico border, has not fully considered its potential impact.

Attorney Drew Ensign, representing the states involved in the legal challenge, told U.S. District Attorney Robert Somer Hayes on Friday that his lawsuit had “nothing to do with the prudence behind the May 23 announcement to end the policy.”

Instead, Encycline argues that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has failed to follow proper administrative procedures for collecting public notification and comments on decisions that end sanctions imposed under Section 42.

More than 1.8 million Section 42 deportation orders have been implemented since March 2020, when the country first moved to Lockdown due to COVID-19 status, the first time this policy was implemented under the administration of former President Donald Trump.

However, human rights groups say the move is aimed at preventing asylum at the border.

Section 42 allows U.S. authorities to quickly deport many refugees arriving at the border without giving them the opportunity to apply for protection in the country, which rights groups say is a threat to the US. And violates international law.

U.S. state lawsuit alleges failure to properly assess increase in border crossings and its potential impact [File: Jose Luis Gonzalez/Reuters]

The lawsuit was filed on April 23 after the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced on April 23 that the CDC would no longer require sanctions.

Arizona, Louisiana and 18 other states in Missouri quickly filed lawsuits before joining a legal challenge at Friday’s hearing. Texas sued independently.

States allege that the increase in border crossings and their potential impact, including pressure on state health care systems and border enforcement resources to switch from drug control to illegal crossing control, have not been properly considered.

Jean Lynn of the Justice Department argued Friday that the CDC has the power to lift emergency health restrictions, which she believes are no longer necessary. She said the CDC order was a health policy issue, not an immigration policy issue.

“There is no basis for using Title 42 as a safety valve,” Lim told SummerHaze.

Several immigrant legal groups have called on Summerhouse to allow at least one planned removal of Article 42 in the two border states of California and New Mexico, which did not challenge the government’s decision.

But the attempt to end the policy comes months before the crucial US midterm elections in November, encouraging some Republicans who want to turn immigration into an issue before the vote.

Immigrants return to Mexico
Rights groups say Article 42 violates international law [File: Jose Luis Gonzalez/Reuters]

“Ending refugee protection for those fleeing violence and human rights abuses is a betrayal of the so-called values ​​of the Democratic Party and our national identity,” said Frank Shari, executive director of the Voice of America, an advocacy group for immigration reform. , Said. Said. An announcement on Wednesday. Said in a statement.

“It does nothing to stop Republican attacks and lies on the border, nor does it help modernize our immigration system so that it serves our interests and reflects our values,” Shari said in a statement.

In March, US authorities detained more than 221,000 refugees on the Mexican border, the highest level in 22 years. Many of them are repeat traverses.

The powers of Title 42 apply equally to all nations. Mexico has agreed to repatriate immigrants from Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador and Mexico, but has largely refused to repatriate immigrants from other countries.

According to Article 42, the United States sends Haitian refugees, including those not living in the country, on deportation flights to the troubled country.

Earlier this year, however, U.S. border officials revoked Article 42 deportation orders for Ukrainians fleeing the war and allowing them to enter the United States through the US-Mexico border.

Leave a Reply